รามเกียรติ์เป็นเรื่องจริง? เปิดหลักฐานที่ซ่อนอยู่ในรามายณะ จนโยงถึงพระพุทธเจ้า
Summary
The talk goes back to the Rāmāyaṇa itself and asks which parts might rest on something historical — Rāma’s route, Ayodhyā, Kiṣkindhā, Laṅkā, and the bridge.
Rāvaṇa and the vānara in the original text look significantly different from the figures Thai audiences know.
The thread back to Buddhism is the Ikṣvāku line — and the shift in what ariya means, from a matter of descent to a matter of training.
Key points
An epic can be how memory is stored
Societies without writing use narrative to do the work an archive does.
Rāvaṇa in the source is not the demon we picture
The familiar Thai figure has passed through several layers of interpretation and performance.
Vānara may not mean monkey
Read as the name of a people rather than an animal, the whole story shifts in weight.
The Buddha redefined ariya
From birth to conduct, concentration and understanding — the most consequential reversal of a word in the whole story.